yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense

Monday, June 23, 2014

What will happen to current Iraq's crises if equated with the U.S. 9/11?


Updated: July 14, 2014

Iraq’s nightmare during the 2003-2011[1] which compromised their security, economy, tranquility and beautiful life seems to be repeated now that the U.S. government announced[2]of deployment[3] of up to 300 military[4] advisers to aid the Iraqi military,[5] as the crises surge caused by the sectarian[6] divisions in Iraq[7]

Let’s try to establish how this strife in Iraq[8]continues and connect it with 9/11 which is allegedly a hoax according to the exposés on social network:

Iraq was the heartland of the Islamic Empire in the early Middle Ages, which was destroyed by the invading Mongol[9] in 13th century.

1932 - became independent under British control which was part of the Ottoman Empire[10] from the 15th century.

1958 - the British installed monarchy collapsed. 
1968 - The coup led the Arab nationalist Ba'ath (Renaissance) party to power. 
Oil made the country rich.  In fact, during his term, President Saddam Hussein produced up to 95% of its foreign exchange earnings in 1979.


1980-1988 Iraq-Iran war and 1991 Gulf War triggered by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, together with the successive imposition of international sanctions devastated the country’s economy and society.

The subsequent violence and 2003 invasion destroyed the residual economy. Billions of dollars in revenues were lost brought by insurgents’ attacks on Iraq’s oil. 
Kurdish[11] which is found in the north has managed with its own autonomous region.
Before the 2003 wars, Iraq’s domestic oil industry was closed to Western oil companies.  After a decade of war, this was hugely privatized and dictated by foreign companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP and Shell and a slew of American oil service companies like Halliburton, the Texas-based firm Dick Cheney ran before becoming George W. Bush's running mate in 2000, who are harvesting a whopping profit while Iraq remains poor and even poorer.

Taken from the exposé[12] on the social network, before the 2003 war, in 1991, the first Bush administration publicly urged the Iraqi's to revolt against Hussein after the first Gulf War.  They heeded but did not get any support from Washington. Hussein then killed tens of thousands of those who flouted him using the weapons the U.S. gave him in the 1980s.

When the Kuwaiti's intruded Iraq’s oil in 1990, Hussein warned them to stop but did not listen. Hussein got the green light from Washington to engage in a war.

According to the report, the U.S. supported him not for the common good but to enrich those who control the international war machine: Union Carbide, Dupont, Honeywell, Betchel, and Spectrum Physics, all American companies.

The report points out that the Iraq war was generated not because Saddam is evil but a President who was used by the globalist to advance their ambitions in exchange of the welfare of the mass.  They conceptualized all sorts of a fabricated patriotism to justify attacks against another country and killing of thousands of innocent civilians, when Saddam could no longer align himself to the secret agenda.

Although I personally condemn these violent acts of the militants and protesters, as I was thinking of this, no one could blame if at one point an Iraqi journalist throws shoe at President Bush in a press conference, or why do Jihadist, Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS,)[13]and other militant groups and activists continue on its existence.  The sectarian division in Iraq can be another avenue to these “business opportunists” to pursue their enterprise.



Hussein was instated in his post as a president for so long not by the Iraqis but by America under the watchful eye of the globalists.  The Iraqi’s did not declare war against the U.S. He may have deserved to stand a trial for crimes against humanity and so should the American government who was behind this deception.

The 2003 campaign to remove Saddam Hussein began with a US missile attack on Baghdad in the early hours of 20 March. US and British forces invaded from the south days later.[14]

After the invasion, the majority Shia excluded from power was initially euphoric when the Iraqi’s grip on power had shrunken.
Subsequently, the despondent insurgent groups (embittered Sunnis, dismissed army officers and supporters of the former regime) started a bloody campaign of blood attacks.
In June 2004, temporary Iraqi government started.  Seven months later, Iraq’s first multi-party elections took place bringing a huge Shia-dominated alliance to power.  Nevertheless, the sectarian violence had not stopped.
The al-Qaeda which was the most violent insurgent beleaguered both the civilians and security forces bringing hundreds of people in carnage.  The strife caused almost a sectarian warfare in 2006-2007 brought by retaliation by kidnappings and killings.
U.S. troops abandoned Iraq’s town and cities and entrusted it to Iraqi forces.  After which, the last U.S. combat troops left in August 2010 followed by another batch in 2011 as pledged by President Barack Obama.
The number of attacks was reduced as the U.S. troops meddled but the sectarian violence[15]stride again in 2013.[16] 





Currently, the sectarian stems from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) which is a jihadist group active in Iraq and Syria[17] which is fighting against the Iraqi government. The last letter in the acronym roots from the Arabic word “al-sham” may mean Levant, Syria or even Damascus.  It refers to the Levant if in the context of the global Jihad.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi leads the organization, who joined the insurgency that exploded shortly after the 2003 US-led invasion.
 “The war is the one and only reason for this long sought and newly acquired access.” Oil was not the only goal of the Iraq War, but it was certainly the central one, as top U.S. military and political figures have attested to in the years following the invasion.- CNN

"Of course it's about oil; we can't really deny that," - Gen. John Abizaid, former head of U.S. Central Command and Military Operations in Iraq, in 2007.

"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil." - Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

People say we're not fighting for oil. Of course we are." - Sen. and now Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel

What transpires currently is the result of a decade of US. Government and oil company pressure. In 1998, Kenneth Derr, then CEO of Chevron, said, "Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas-reserves I'd love Chevron to have access to."

According to the CNN report, in 2000, Exxon, Chevron, BP and Shell, invested to get fellow oilmen Bush and Cheney into office than they had put in on any past election.  Their effort were paid off when the National Energy Policy Development Group, chaired by Cheney, was established, bringing the administration and the oil companies together to design joint energy future.

In May 2001 final report, the task contended that Middle Eastern countries should be pushed "to open up areas of their energy sectors to foreign investment," This has been achieved in Iraq when the State Department Future of Iraq Project's Oil and Energy Working Group met from February 2002 to April 2003 on agreement that Iraq "should be opened to international oil companies as quickly as possible after the war."

In January 2003, representatives from ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Halliburton met with Cheney's staff to discuss plans for Iraq's postwar industry.





PAGES
1 
2
3

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense



yourimagetitle
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY

Adsense

Adsense