yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Jesus condemns not the tradition but the deceitfulness of the human heart!


Many thought that the Catholic Church had messed up the simple Christian faith by inserting all kinds of practices, customs and doctrines over the centuries. They thought the Church in their day was culpable of exactly the same Pharisaical obsession with traditions condemned by Jesus as presented in (Mark 7:1-23).

If we’ll try to revisit the Bible closely, the Lord is not telling that tradition is an unclean word.  In fact, Paul tells in  2 Thessalonians 2:15 to “hold fast to the traditions you received from us, either by our word or by letter.”

Sacred Tradition is the oral teaching of Jesus Christ handed down to His apostles, who in turn handed it down to their disciples (the early Church Fathers), and then to the next generation.

There was no written New testament for almost 400 years.  All of the apostles and disciples taught orally for the first 400 years. Saints Paul, Peter, John, Luke, etc., wrote everything down in their epistles and gospels but none of it was widely available to geographically separated disciples and it wasn't part of "The Bible" until the Councils of Rome, Hippo, and Carthage put the 27 books of the New Testament together in 382 AD, 393 AD, and 397 AD.  


“Tradition” simply means something that is handed or passed on from one person to another, from one generation to another.  The question to ask when analyzing any particular tradition is to establish its origin where its value depends on its source, whether it come from Jesus, from His apostles, from some devout believers who lived centuries later.  The traditions Paul passed down were from the Lord and apostolic traditions, like the meaning and significance of the Eucharist (1 Corinthians 11:23-24) or the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus (1 Corinthians 15;3-11)and so were of greatest importance. 

The traditions of the Pharisees were quite dissimilar. They were not of themselves wicked but were pious customs of human origin passed down to support the practicing of the law.  Unfortunately, the Pharisees were unable to make a distinction between a Divine Law from its human support system.  The worse about it was they actually used virtuous customs as loopholes to help them get around the difficult demands of the Torah.


For example in Mark chapter 7, everyone knows that when God gave Moses and the Israelites the 10 commandments, He meant business.  The fourth commandment, “honor your father and mother,” means not just that young kids ought to obey their parents, but that adult children should provide for the financial needs of aging parents, guaranteeing their lives in declining years in honor and dignity.  But the Pharisees had resort to a non-biblical religious custom that released them from this heavy accountability, by placing their money “dedicated” to God and thereby “sheltered” it, making it unavailable for parental support.

Taken from the above-mentioned situation, it’s not “tradition” that’s the issue here, but the deceitfulness of the human heart that uses piety as an excuse to avoid the accountability of true religion, which include, looking after orphans and widows and presumably elderly relatives in their distress (James 1:27).


And this is exactly Jesus’ point in the gospel that the kinds of foods that humans eat don’t make them spiritually impure. It is the foul things that come out of the deep recesses of the human heart, injured by original sin, that separate every human from God and to one another and lead to all the wretchedness in this world.

The Pharisees believed that they’d purify Israel through nutritional laws and pious customs.  Protestant Reformers of the 16th century thought they could cleanse the church by overstepping ecclesiastical traditions and customs.  History has ascertained that both undertakings are pointless.


There are some examples of Sacred Tradition in the Bible that are interesting.  Acts 20:35 for example were not recorded anywhere else in the Bible, including the 4 gospels, so this is one example of an oral teaching of Jesus being handed on to Paul, who passed it on to the next generation.

Another in the book of Jude 1:9, wherein the dispute between the Archangel Michael and the devil over Moses' body is nowhere to be found in the written text of the Old Testament.


Sacred Scripture does condemn in many places the traditions of man specifically with Jewish practices about not healing on the Sabbath, hoarding money, not helping Samaritans, etc), but these have nothing to do with the Traditions Paul is talking about, as enumerated below which supports Sacred Tradition:

1 Corinthians 11:2 I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold fast to the traditions, just as I handed them on to you.



2 Thessalonians 2:15 Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours

2 Thessalonians 3:6 We instruct you, brothers, in the name of (our) Lord Jesus Christ, to shun any brother who conducts himself in a disorderly way and not according to the tradition they received from us. 


References: 
  1. Marcellino D'Ambrosio, Ph.D., Does Jesus Condemn Tradition?, http://catholicexchange.com/does-jesus-condemn-tradition
  2. http://www.catholicbible101.com/sacredtradition.htm, Sacred Tradition
  3. http://www.catholicbasictraining.com/apologetics/coursetexts/1l.htm, The History of the Bible (CCC 105-108)
  4. http://christianityinview.com/timeline.html, Timeline of Christian History

No comments:

Post a Comment

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense



yourimagetitle
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY

Adsense

Adsense