yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle
yourimagetitle

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense

Friday, April 15, 2016

Two presidential candidates out of six oppose the RH Law




Of the 6 vice presidential candidates, only two are against the reproductive health law.[1]

It can be recalled that at the height of the debates on reproductive health (RH), the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) actively spoke against the RH bill. There were even bishops who fought against RH supporters, labeling them as "Team Patay" (Team of the Dead).

Senator Vicente "Tito" Sotto sided with the CBCP in opposing the proposed law.

Two out of the six vice-presidential aspirants in 2016 are against the Reproductive Health law, as enumerated below: 


Presidential Candidates’ Proposition on
Income Tax
Jejomar Binay
Yes
Tax exemptions for remunerated employees P30,000 and below
Rodrigo Duterte
Yes
Tax exemptions for wage earners P20,000 and below
Grace Poe
Yes
Reclassification of tax brackets
Manuel Roxas II
Yes
Open to cut income tax rates but talks should be made not within election season
Miriam Defensor Santiago
Yes
Overhauling of tax system within 6 months of administration

The Anti-RH Law Rationale

Of all the candidates vying for the Vice Presidential race, only Trillanes and Honasan (tagged by the Diocese of Bacolod in 2013 as Team Buhay (Team of Life) are against the RH law, in addition to the 8 senators who voted against the RH bill in December 2012, Juan Ponce Enrile, Ramon Revilla Jr, Vicente Sotto III, Aquilino Pimentel III, Jinggoy Estrada, and Manuel Villar.

Speaking to the students of the University of Asia and the Pacific in 2013 , he gave emphasis on opposition to the RH law particularly its provisions on "sex education. He claimed that RH law authors want to use curricula from Western countries, with "graphic materials showing conjugal relations and an approach on the use of contraceptives."

The RH law focuses on "age-and-development-appropriate" reproductive health education for adolescents taught by "adequately trained teachers, including values formation, knowledge, and skills in self-protection against teenage pregnancy, discrimination, sexual abuse, violence against women and children (VAWC), and other forms of gender-based violence; while explaining the physical, social, and emotional changes among adolescents, rights of women and children, responsible teenage behavior, gender and development, and responsible parenthood.

Whereas Trillanes' understanding of sexuality education is similar to that of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), which believes that sexuality education "should not go into too much details in teaching intercourse or artificial contraceptives, as Fr. Dave Clay of the CBCP Commission on Family and Life emphasized. 

Trillanes also argued that a “business interest” is behind the RH law, involving billions of taxpayer money.

Similarly, Honasan is against the RH law and supports any move to revoke the law, asserting that population density is not the cause of poverty.

The Pro-RH Intellectualization

Escudero favored the RH law, saying that he wants "each and every newborn Filipino to be given a fair and equal chance to uplift and improve their lives.

Cayetano pointed out that the RH law does not promote abortion, promiscuity, teenage sex and pregnancy, rather aims to prevent and address such issues.

Bongbong Marcos supports the RH law pointing to the witnessed agony and hardship of young women and men, when caught in a situation that they're ill-prepared and often ignorant of, as factors. He also authored a version of the RH bill during his term as Ilocos Norte congressman.

Robredo wants to "fully implement the RH Law to reduce poverty and overpopulation in the country.

The Verdict

Sex is everybody’s right as this earth would never flourish with a country that is depopulated.  However, sex is not a healthy subject to be brought in the four corner of schools as this is not the right period for complete awareness of it as this is intended for corporate preparation.  

The rationale behind the RH law is evidently conceptualized with careful analysis including the different line of reasoning (except the attempt to teach intercourse). Remember its knowledge never outweigh the negative effects once the awareness of the individuals are brought into this, their minds start to be titillated and haunted.  Since they are aware that prevention on possible pregnancy is thus all provided, the next move is actual experimentation until addiction on it gradually crops up.  Remember that anything that is fed in the minds is addictive especially if it offers pleasure.  When pleasures conquer the minds, conquer the minds adverse effects start to pour in: premarital sex resulting to unprepared marriage, rape, multiple sexual partners brought by sexual addiction, hence, exposing these individuals to a compromising lifestyles – DOMINO EFFECTS.  Personally, when I learned masturbation in high school after exploring it when I overheard about it from a playmate, addiction on it started which affected my study habits, what more if it’s intercourse that could be heard in the classes? 

Could you imagine that in 2016 there was supposedly a P1-billion budget allocation for contraceptives, thanks be to God that it was not approved.  How ironic, when in fact the government has been into a difficulty of providing quality classrooms for the poor public students while attempting to allot 1 billion peso funds on contraceptives. 

May God enlighten the hearts and minds of every politicians.



PAGES
1
2




More 2016 Election-Related Updates Here


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9





[1] Fritzie Rodriguez, Where do VP bets stand on RH law, women?, Published 12:04 PM, March 29, 2016, Updated 12:04 PM, March 29, 2016, http://www.rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2016/128587-vice-president-bets-divorce

No comments:

Post a Comment

Adsense

Adsense

Adesense



yourimagetitle
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY
Visit us @ FRIENDS OF THE DIVINE MERCY

Adsense

Adsense